Evidence-led guides for choosing, evaluating, and leaving veterinary software. Written by the team building OpenVPM, with our interests stated plainly and sources linked where claims can change.
Follow one fictional client request from intake to a resolved reply. Test contact preferences, review, delivery failures, ownership, and duplicate sends before choosing a shared inbox.
Test what happens after a client reviews a plan: the exact version they saw, approved quantities, retained declines, staff ownership, performed work, and the final invoice.
Run a two-animal house call through your next PIMS demo: separate records, one travel fee, unfinished notes, payment choices, and an interrupted connection.
Compare 11 veterinary PIMS platforms, then use a downloadable demo scorecard to check records, handoffs, invoices, payments, migration, and practice fit.
ezyVet is a genuinely capable IDEXX-owned system. Here are the real alternatives, compared by workflow fit, API access, ownership, and current published pricing.
Cornerstone has run large hospitals for decades. When the server refresh, the training burden, or the bill finally forces the question, here are the real options, honestly compared.
AVImark practices kept it for decades for a reason: a license you own, data in the building. Here is where that instinct leads in 2026, compared honestly.
One is a mature multi-site platform from Nordhealth. The other is a newer AI-first entrant. An evidence-led comparison from a vendor that competes with both.
Hippo Manager was acquired by Shepherd in March 2025. Here's an honest comparison of where displaced practices are landing and what to look for in a new system.
A plain-language guide for practice owners: what open-source veterinary PIMS actually means, how managed hosting changes the cost equation, and who it's for.
The exciting thing about AI in veterinary medicine isn't a chatbot on the website. It's an agent that can actually do the busywork, if the PIMS lets it.